<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>iMomentum SEO Services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://imomentum.net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://imomentum.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:42:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Evolution of Social Media as a Ranking Factor</title>
		<link>http://imomentum.net/evolution-of-social-media-as-a-ranking-factor/</link>
		<comments>http://imomentum.net/evolution-of-social-media-as-a-ranking-factor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imomentum.net/?p=213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Social (for now) is just one factor for rankings. Dont think of its primary role is for backlinks.  Im not tweeting for backlinks.  Im tweeting for BUZZ.  Google is using this buzz as another piece of their ranking algorithm. Tweets are a totally separate ranking factor as is FB shares, and likes, with shares being [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social (for now) is just one factor for rankings. Dont think of its primary role is for backlinks.  Im not tweeting for backlinks.  Im tweeting for BUZZ.  Google is using this buzz as another piece of their ranking algorithm. Tweets are a totally separate ranking factor as is FB shares, and likes, with shares being more valuable. Just as quality, quantity, diversity, and velocity of links are separate ranking factors.</p>
<p>Social media is the evolution of online search and marketing.  Its everything we have been doing but faster.  Twitter is instant blogging.  Facebook is the original AOL right?  Make friends online, chat and leave them messages.  The web is constantly evolving at a faster rate.</p>
<p>Current SEO practices have basically remained the same since I began in 1998, adding some changes over the years, and we will have to evolve into the social web. Over the past 15 years I have seen the changes leading up to this. In the early 90’s it was Infoseek that dominated the search space. Loading your webpage with your search terms got your 1st page ranking. As we came into the late 90’s the king was Yahoo and the “popular buzz” was the amount of backlinks to your site that ranked you higher.  I proved this by ranking 10-15 of the top 20 positions on Yahoo from 1998 to 2002 and on Google in 2002-03 for &#8220;home loans&#8221;. Then as Google became the dominate player PageRank became another major factor and aged sites like mine had PageRank.  This is the quality of inbound links.  As the online digital age moves into an even faster way to communicate using social networks, Google will use these communication signals to determine what the “buzz” is and make that relevant in search results.  This buzz started with meta tags keyword density, to amount of backlinks, to PR links, and is evolving to social media. I have continued to adopt new technologies early on which benefits me and my clients as we continue to rank 1st page for high traffic keywords.</p>
<p>But keep in mind its only one factor for ranking and not evenly weighted when its comes to using it for SEO. Social Media is still a great experiment. Lastly <a href="http://imomentum.net/social-network-marketing/twitter-marketing/" target="_blank">Twitter </a>and Facebook have added search functions, Google added +1.  These next few years are going to be very interesting to see who will dominate the Web for search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://imomentum.net/evolution-of-social-media-as-a-ranking-factor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress Themes Effect Search Rankings</title>
		<link>http://imomentum.net/wordpress-themes-effect-search-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://imomentum.net/wordpress-themes-effect-search-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 23:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imomentum.net/?p=226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few months ago I was having difficulty ranking a new website of mine and I was doing everything right.  It just wasn&#8217;t popping how my sites usually do.  The one thing I could find that was different was a theme I was using from StudioPress. I was using their Lifestyle theme.  So I did [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few months ago I was having difficulty ranking a new website of mine and I was doing everything right.  It just wasn&#8217;t popping how my sites usually do.  The one thing I could find that was different was a theme I was using from <a href="http://www.studiopress.com/" target="_blank">StudioPress</a>. I was using their Lifestyle theme.  So I did a test.  I registered 3 domains all using the same name with .com, .net, and .org.  I used the same exact content, same structure, and I got 10 backlinks to each domain from the same sources.  I did randomize the backlinks order as to not give one domain more back link juice. The 3 themes I used were Lifestyle, Serenity, and a Woo theme.</p>
<p>Lifestyle was on .com<br />
Serenity was on .net<br />
Woo was on .org</p>
<p>5 days later my rankings were</p>
<p>.com #64<br />
.net #1<br />
.org #4</p>
<p>I left them alone for two weeks and .com moved up to #43</p>
<p>So two weeks later I switched the StudioPress themes to the following:</p>
<p>Lifestyle to the .net<br />
Serenity to the .com</p>
<p>3 days later the sites reversed positioning</p>
<p>.net (Lifestyle) dropped to #47<br />
.com moved to #1</p>
<p>My last test I changed the .org (Woo) theme with the .net (lifestyle)</p>
<p>A week later the .org (now Lifestyle) moved to position #33<br />
.net (now woo) moved up to position #6</p>
<p>Now I published these results on the StudioPress forum and got so much slack from the moderators,developers, and so called SEO experts there. They eventually took my post down.  I guess thats why they still use PPC. LOL. However I received a few emails from people who were so thankful for my post and changed out their Lifestyle Theme.  I heard back from a few of them later and their sites moved up several pages.</p>
<p>The funny thing was this post in the StudioPress forum got pretty ugly.  Name calling, and people telling me that there is no way themes effect rankings.  Well over the years I have proven that a sites design, layout, coding, all effect rankings.  the position of keywords, internal links, images, and percentage of words vs. keywords all have an effect on your search rankings.  Too bad these guys at StudioPress wouldn&#8217;t listen to me.  But hey I have always been a trailblazer in the SEO field.</p>
<p>This Reminds me of the time I attended an SEO conference back in 2001 and this so called expert stated in front of a group of 1000 people that there is not magic number for the amount of keywords on a webpage. Keep in mind Yahoo was the big search engine then. So this so called expert was the SEO person for GetSmart.com which was a mortgage company similar to my LoansAmerica site at the time.  So I called her out and asked her to search yahoo for keyword &#8220;mortgages&#8221; and then keyword &#8220;home loans&#8221;. I then stood up and showed the audience that GetSmart was listed no where on the 1st two pages, however I had 18 websites on the 1st two pages.</p>
<p>So back to StudiPress.  They have great themes and a few of them I do recommend for SEO:<br />
Corporate<br />
Enterprise<br />
Executive<br />
Freelance<br />
Serenity</p>
<p>Stay away from Lifestyle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://imomentum.net/wordpress-themes-effect-search-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

